Appeals Court Finds Lawsuit Against Supplement Maker Preempted
The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a district court decision siding with dietary supplement maker NBTY over structure/function claims on its vitamin E supplements claiming to “support cardiovascular health” and to “promote immune function,” “immune health,” “heart health,” and “circulatory health.” In Dachauer vs. NBTY, plaintiff Paul Dachauer argued that the product’s label statements violate two California laws against false advertising because the supplements do not prevent cardiovascular disease and might increase the risk of all-cause mortality.
The appeals court found that FDA’s regulations expressly preempt state-law requirements for claims about dietary supplements that differ from agency requirements. The opinion noted that agency regulations distinguish between “disease claims,” which are not permitted on supplements, and “structure/function claims” that manufacturers make about their products. It further held that FDA’s regulations “preempted plaintiff’s claims to the extent that he argued that defendants’ structure/function claims were false or misleading because their supplements did not prevent cardiovascular disease.”