Appeals Court Remands Elements of Clomid Case
The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has remanded to a Utah federal court portions of a failure-to-warn case brought against Aventis over its fertility drug Clomid (clomiphene citrate). The Utah court had granted summary judgment to Aventis on the failure-to-warn, breach of implied warranty, negligent misrepresentation, and fraud claims brought by a couple who said their son was born with birth defects associated with the woman’s use of the drug before she became pregnant.
In granting summary judgment to Aventis, the district court reasoned that FDA would not have approved the type of warning labels the plaintiff couple sought. The appeals court agreed with the district court about a warning about risks associated with Clomid before pregnancy, noting that the agency had rejected a citizen petition making virtually identical claims about pre-pregnancy risks to a fetus.
But it said the district court erred in ruling that federal preemption applied to the claim about a warning for drug use during pregnancy. The claim addressed Utah law, while Aventis made its motion for summary judgment based on federal law.
“The district court did not consider whether it could rest on Utah law when deciding a summary judgment motion that had relied on federal preemption,” the appeals court decision said. “Because the district court did not consider the question and it has not been fully briefed on appeal, we leave this question for the district court to address on remand.”
The court also said that the district court should consider on remand the plaintiffs’ implied warranty, negligent misrepresentation, and fraud claims since they are all distinguishable from the failure-to-warn claims because they are based on “affirmative misrepresentations rather than on a failure to provide a warning.”