AZ Wants Restrictions on Applications Citing Faslodex
AstraZeneca says that FDA should not approve a Teva 505(b)(2) application referencing Faslodex (fulvestrant) intramuscular injection as the listed drug and that proposes a drug product asserted to have a different formulation unless certain conditions are met. The AstraZeneca petition says FDA should require that:
- the application contain data showing that the purportedly different formulation does not render the proposed product unsafe, including (1) clinical data demonstrating safety and efficacy with respect to the risks of tissue damage and pain at the injection site; and (2) if the proposed product contains any inactive ingredient in an amount higher than that established to be safe for repeated intramuscular administration over an extended period of time, data from toxicity testing showing that the proposed product does not present safety concerns; and
- the application contain appropriate bridging ceremonies, including data from a study comparing the proposed product’s bioavailability to that of Faslodex IM injection at multiple-dose steady state, to provide an adequate basis for reliance upon FDA’s finding that Faslodex IM injection is safe and effective.
The company also asks that FDA not designate the proposed Teva product as therapeutically equivalent to Faslodex IM injection unless certain specified conditions are met, and that the agency take the same actions with respect to any other 505(b)(2) application that claims Faslodex IM injection as the listed drug and proposes a drug product claimed to have a different formulation.
“The unique properties of fulvestrant and intramuscular injections make the specific data identified in this petition necessary as a public health matter,” AstraZeneca says.