Benefit-Risk is Top CBER Panel Issue: FDA

Share

A new journal article by CBER reviewers that looked at 24 advisory committee meetings held to discuss benefit-risk issues between 2009 and 2021 found that the two most frequently discussed considerations were “uncertainty about assessment of the safety profile” and “uncertainty about assessment of the benefit based on clinical trial data” (16/24 times each).

The reviewers also found that discussions on trial participant demographic diversity took place at many of the panel meetings. “Many of the discussions were regarding the subpopulations that were excluded from some RCTs [randomized clinical trials] of novel products, e.g., children and racial/ethnic minorities,” they wrote. The committees “recognized the importance of factors such as race/ethnicity, sex, and age in clinical trial design so that benefit-risk assessments are more representative of the diversity of the target population.”

The reviewers concluded that a 2021 draft guidance entitled “Benefit-Risk Assessment for New Drug and Biological Products” is a good tool for both FDA and sponsors when planning and preparing for panel meetings. “Identification of key B-R [benefit-risk] factors could be helpful to the FDA in the continuous process of building capacity for regulatory reviews,” they said. “Such capacity building includes, but is not limited to, recruiting experts in areas of emerging technologies and enhancing regulatory science related to B-R assessment methodology, patient inputs, and real-world evidence. This in turn may further facilitate the sound risk-benefit judgments that are at the heart of all FDA regulatory decisions.”

Read more