BMJ Study Questions Post-approval Study Data Quality/Quantity
Data from post-approval clinical trials required for certain novel drugs approved on limited evidence (e.g., surrogate endpoints) varied in quality and quantity, “with few controlled studies published after approval that confirmed efficacy using clinical outcomes for the original FDA approved indication,” according to a new study in the British Medical Journal.
The study looked at 117 novel drugs for 123 indications approved between 2005 and 2012 on the basis of a single pivotal trial. “Overall, no postapproval studies were identified for 43 of the 123 (35.0%) approved indications,” study authors said. Less than one-tenth of new drug indications approved by FDA on the basis of surrogate markers of disease “had at least one post-approval trial validating the use of the surrogate marker by showing superior efficacy using clinical outcomes,” they added.
“To strengthen lifecycle evaluation of recently approved drugs, requirements for postapproval studies should be heightened and may need to specify study design characteristics or trial endpoints in detail to ensure that these studies provide high quality evidence to further inform clinical practice,” the study authors concluded. “Of course, it must be remembered that publishing one short term, small post-approval study might be inadequate for a hypertension drug but entirely reasonable for one treating a rare disease. A customized, specific plan for post-approval studies will be key to generating an adequate amount of postapproval evidence on comparative efficacy, which should take into consideration disease prevalence and severity, the drug’s anticipated length of use, and the availability of other treatment options.”