CA Appeals Court Upholds Federal Preemption
The California Court of Appeal has upheld federal preemption in a case involving the heart drug amiodarone. Attorney Steven Boranian (Reed Smith) writes in a Drug & Device Law Blog post that the plaintiffs in the case alleged that they experienced severe effects after their doctors prescribed amiodarone off-label. The plaintiffs said the drug’s branded and generic manufacturers failed adequately to warn plaintiffs of potential risks because they did not ensure that patients received FDA-approved medication guides with their prescriptions.
A California trial court dismissed the medication guide claims without leave to amend their filing, Boranian says, and the Court of Appeal affirmed in a published opinion.
The appeals court said that federal law preempted the plaintiffs’ failure-to-warn claims because the plaintiffs were trying to enforce the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). “There is no private right of action under the FFDCA,” Boranian writes.
He also says the court rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that they were basing their claims only on state law because the drug manufacturers owed the plaintiffs no duty to warn under California law since the state’s learned intermediary doctrine holds that a drug manufacturer’s duty to warn runs to doctors and not directly to patients.