Califf on FDA and the Clinical Community

Share

FDA commissioner Robert Califf says the gap between FDA clearance or approval of a medical product and use of the product to treat patients “should be filled by an invigorated clinical research system that generates evidence that patients, clinicians, and health systems need to make well-informed decisions.” Writing in a New England Journal of Medicine Viewpoint, Califf says FDA programs can stimulate progress in evidence generation, but these programs will be more successful if leaders of academic institutions, health systems, and professional societies prioritize evidence generation as a professional activity.

Noting that the global information environment has been “contaminated by misinformation and disinformation,” Califf says FDA must be more proactive in preempting and countering misinformation, but the complexity of the issue requires collaboration across sectors to “create an information environment in which decisions about diet, testing, and therapeutic interventions made by consumers, patients, and clinicians are more likely to be informed by reliable information based on high-quality evidence from trustworthy sources.”

Turning to the agency priority for accelerating progress against cancer, rare diseases, and chronic conditions, Califf writes that regulatory models that stimulate innovation while detecting risks will require new systems for clinical evaluation to assess outcomes during the long interval needed to evaluate the benefits and risks of interventions with potentially life-long effects, often amid scientific and clinical uncertainty at the outset of treatment.

Other priorities addressed in the article are continuing major efforts against Covid-19, addressing drug use and overdose, reducing harm from tobacco, human and animal health, and reversing inequities in health outcomes.

Read more