CDER Denies Oxtellar BE Petition
CDER has denied an 8/3/15 Supernus Pharmaceuticals petition asking that the agency require specific partial area under the plasma concentration-time curve bioequivalence parameters to govern the review and approval of any ANDA referencing Oxtellar XR (oxcarbazepine) as the reference-listed drug. The denial letter says that while the Center agrees with the company that changes in the formulation of a generic oxcarbazepine extended-release product may result in different pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, it does not agree that differences in the PK profile for generic versions of tablets demonstrated to be bioequivalent to Oxtellar XR in accordance with FDA’s draft oxcarbazepine guidance would have a clinically meaningful impact on the drug’s safety and efficacy.
It also said that in preparing its response to the petition, the Center conducted simulations of four separate hypothetical test formulations of extended-release oxcarbazepine with different release or absorption rates based on the PK and pharmacodynamics models in the Oxtellar XR NDA submission. “These simulations indicated that the four hypothetical test formulations would be considered bioequivalent to Oxtellar XR under FDA’s traditional PK metrics, but would not be considered bioequivalent under the partial AUC metrics proposed by petitioner. These simulations further suggested that despite having different PK profiles, these four hypothetical test formulations would be associated with similar efficacy responses … and safety responses…. As a result, these simulations support FDA’s position that generic oxcarbazepine extended-release products that are considered bioequivalent to Oxtellar XR … can be expected to have the same therapeutic effect as Oxtellar XR, notwithstanding any difference in PK profiles.”