CDER Drug Inspection Common Deficiencies

Share

CDER Office of Process and Facilities branch chief Ying Zhang recently presented (see slides) common issues and deficiencies cited during pre‐approval drug inspections. Speaking at the Pharma and Biopharma Outsourcing Association’s annual conference in Rockville, MD 9/20, Zhang listed the deficiencies and they include: 

  • Inconsistencies between facility information in 356h form and Common Technical Document Modules S.2 and P.3
  • Inconsistencies in reported Facility Establishment Identifier or headquarters site provided
  • Missing contract facilities used for submission batches (list in Module 3)
  • Missing drug substance manufacturing testing facilities listed in drug master file
  • Specify if only sourcing from specific facilities
  •  Lack of detailed information regarding operations or tests to be conducted at each facility
  • Facility not performing listed function or unaware it was referenced in the ANDA
  • Facility no longer in commercial operation 

Zhang also noted another troubling deficiency cited in preapproval inspections, which is a “lack of conformance to application and data integrity issues.” For example, she said, this includes falsified data (complete fabrication of sterility testing, environmental monitoring, water for injection testing, biological indicators for sterilization, bioburden samples, endotoxin testing, and media fills). Other concerns involve quality assurance unit approval of incomplete or erroneous laboratory data, changes of specification (widening) not reported in the application, and testing into compliance, she said.

 

Additionally, Zhang pointed out common issues and deficiencies observed during contract facility inspections. These include: 

  • Equipment not adequately qualified, maintained and upgraded
  •  Inadequate process validation
  •  Inadequate method transfer
  •  Inadequate operation instructions in batch record
  •  Process deviations are not thoroughly investigated; lack of implementation of appropriate CAPA. 
  • Lack of appropriate change control
  • Lack of appropriate communication with applicant: such as the knowledge transfer from applicant to contract facility about product and process development information; and contract facilities sharing product quality information

Read more