CDER Statisticians Working on Adaptive Clinical Trials

Share

CDER says its statisticians are designing clinical trials with adaptive features to make clinical evaluation of new drug treatments more efficient and informative. In an online Regulatory Science Impact Story, Center officials describe the challenges involved in evaluating treatments for Ebola during the outbreak a few years ago.

“A randomized trial is essential for collecting conclusive evidence about the relative benefits of treatments,” the article says, “but it is difficult to conduct trials in the context of an epidemic, in part because it would be unethical to withhold potentially effective treatments from patients.

In the Ebola trial, CDER says, patients were randomly assigned to what was then the optimized standard of care or that care plus investigational treatments for which promising nonclinical evidence existed. To further address ethical concerns of withholding effective treatment from patients, the trial was designed so that if a treatment proved efficacious, it could become the new standard of care for all trial participants. Also, the Center says, investigators could add or drop raw investigational treatments as information became available.

The article also discusses other innovative trials being developed by CDER statisticians that meet precision medicine challenges.

Read more