CDER’s Ellis Unger Retiring After 24 Years at Agency
After 24 years at FDA, CDER Office of Cardiology, Hematology, Endocrinology, and Nephrology director Ellis Unger has decided to retire to spend more time with family. Joining FDA in 1997 as a medical officer at CBER, in 2003, he transitioned to CDER when regulatory authority for therapeutic biologics was transferred there and he began serving as Division of Cardiovascular and Renal Products deputy director. In 2009, Unger moved to the Office of Drug Evaluation-I in 2009, and became its director in 2012. And last year, as part of CDER’s reorganization, Unger moved to his current position.
Unger may best be remembered for being embroiled (see story) in the review and approval of Sarepta’s controversial Duchenne drug Exondys 51 (eteplirsen). At the time, he found himself in contentious dispute with then-CDER director Janet Woodcock that saw her overriding his decision to reject the drug’s approval (see earlier story). In response to a memo from FDA commissioner Robert Califf that ruled in Woodcock’s favor to approve eteplirsen, Unger complained that proper procedures were not followed because Woodcock failed to review all evidence and analyses before she rendered her decision, and that the decision would set a general precedent — where accelerated approval could be provided for a rare disease based solely on the medical and scientific judgment/opinion of the Center director.
Unger was also particularly troubled that the approval could lower the standard for all rare disease drugs. He questioned whether any increase in a surrogate endpoint could be used to support approval for other drugs. “Perhaps granting accelerated approval to drugs that show a mere scintilla of an effect on a surrogate endpoint represents a stroke of brilliance — one that will stimulate investment in the development of drugs for these disorders,” he told Califf. “But in my opinion, this approach should receive broader public (and FDA) input before being implemented. Your decision seems to say that the ‘reasonably likely’ standard for accelerated approval need have no quantitative component at all.
This foreboding concern about accelerated approval appears to have again been raised in FDA’s recent controversial approval for Biogen's Alzheimer’s therapy Aduhelm (aducanumab).