Challenges in Using a Single IRB in Multisite Trials
Professors from Columbia University and the University of Massachusetts medical school say that new federal rules on the protection of human research participants calling for use of a central or single institutional review board in multisite research funded by the National Institutes of Health raise questions that must be resolved. Writing in an online opinion piece in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the three authors say there are three critical aspects that academic institutions, researchers, and policy makers will have to resolve before implementing the new policy: (1) the relationship between the single IRB and local institutions, including local IRBs; (2) the collection and incorporation of local knowledge in the single IRB review; and (3) the relationship between the single IRB and local researchers.
“These issues involve fundamental legal, ethical, institutional, and policy tensions that will profoundly shape the costs and effectiveness of future multistate research involving human research participants,” the authors write.
They say that data on the process and outcomes of a single IRB system should be collected and analyzed to formulate best practices for defining the relationships and boundaries between local IRBs and single IRBs, developing standardized ways for single IRBs to account for local practices, and establishing working relationships between single IRBs and investigators. “Appropriate implementation of the NIH single-IRB policy will be key to developing an efficient research-friendly process for multisite IRB reviews that continues to ensure the protection of human research participants,” the authors conclude.