China Surpasses U.S. in Novel Cancer Drug Approvals Since 2023: Analysis

Share

China approved more novel oncology drugs than the U.S. between 2020 and 2025, with its annual approval totals surpassing FDA’s beginning in 2023, according to a new analysis published in Health Affairs Scholar by Friends of Cancer Research. The analysis found that China's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) approved 94 novel cancer drugs during the six-year period, compared with 87 approvals by the FDA. The NMPA's approval volume increased significantly from 2023 through 2025, exceeding the FDA's output in each of those years.

Despite China's higher overall approval count, the report concluded that the FDA continues to hold important advantages in review speed and innovation, according to the journal article. The agency reviewed oncology drug applications a median of 182 days faster than the NMPA and approved five times as many global first-in-class cancer therapies during the study period. Among the 14 oncology drugs approved by both regulators, FDA authorized the products a median of 164 days earlier than its Chinese counterpart.

"The United States remains a global leader in bringing truly novel cancer therapies to patients," Friends of Cancer Research president Jeff Allen is quoted in a release as saying. However, he warned that China's rapid progress demonstrates that U.S. leadership "cannot be taken for granted," calling for continued investment in regulatory science, predictable development pathways, and research infrastructure.

The study found that expedited regulatory programs played a central role in cancer drug approvals in both countries. Such programs supported 87% of FDA oncology approvals and 65% of approvals by the NMPA, reflecting the growing reliance on mechanisms intended to speed the development and review of therapies for serious diseases.

The authors said the findings underscore the importance of continued regulatory modernization and international collaboration as oncology drug development becomes increasingly global. They argued that understanding the strengths of different regulatory systems can help improve patient access to innovative therapies while maintaining scientific rigor.

Read more