Coherus Biosciences Wants Apotex Neulasta Petition Denied

Share

Coherus Biosciences says FDA must deny an Apotex petition that contains a misunderstanding about the role of clinical studies in a biosimilar application submitted under the regulatory pathway created by the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act. The Coherus response says that “Apotex’ misunderstanding has led the company to erroneously conclude that a specific type of clinical study is or is not required for regulatory approval of a biosimilar application." Coherus requests that FDA correct Apotex’ mistaken conclusion so that other biosimilar sponsors are not misled into believing that additional unnecessary, and therefore unethical, clinical studies must be undertaken to obtain licensure of a biosimilar.”

“The goal overall is that any biosimilar sponsor compile, after an expedited development program, a data package that is scientifically well-founded and that provides evidence that the biosimilar will behave clinically in the same manner as its reference product,” Coherus says. “This can be achieved even though the data package is not expected to contain clinical trials in every indication or every population in which the reference product is in use. This point is amply demonstrated by the five biosimilars FDA has licensed. The concept of extrapolation is founded on the exquisite molecular match possible through the careful use of modern analytical methods. Such a match is essential to the development of biosimilars, and ultimately to the development of interchangeable biologics. It is also data that are privileged to each sponsor and on the basis of which each clinical confirmatory program will have been individually negotiated with the agency.”

Read more