Commerce Committee Probes FDA Internal Disputes
The U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Republican leadership is investigating FDA’s handling of internal scientific disagreements related to regulatory decisions. In a 1/3 letter to agency commissioner Robert Califf, Committee leaders took issue with the 2021 departure of CBER Office of Vaccines Research and Review (OVRR) director Marion Gruber and her deputy Philip Krause, who both left FDA in protest over how the agency and Biden Administration were handling Covid-19 vaccine reviews and approvals (see earlier story).
In the letter, the leaders note that neither Gruber nor Krause believed there was enough data to justify offering booster shots at the time, and both felt pressure from the Biden Administration to authorize the shots quickly. “It is unknown whether the FDA dispute resolution process was used, and if not, why not,” they write. “We are concerned that the FDA may have retaliated against career FDA regulators who were viewed as insufficiently cooperative with the Biden administration’s agenda.”
The Committee’s letter seeks updated information on how FDA is managing internal scientific disagreements, and it requests the following:
- Copies of the administrative files related to all internal scientific disagreements at FDA since 1/1/2018.
- All documents since 1/1/2018 related to the Office of Chief Scientist’s handling of appeals of internal scientific disagreements.
- All documents related to the scientific disagreement over coronavirus booster vaccination during 2021.
- All documents since 1/1/2018 related to instances where decision-making authority was removed from FDA officials involved in regulatory decisions.