Concerns on Drug Quality Metrics Proposal Aired

Share

The International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering (ISPE) says it recognizes and thanks FDA for applying the lessons learned from the pilot Quality Metrics Site Visit Program and the Quality Metrics Feedback Program in developing an agency quality metrics reporting program proposal. In a comment letter, ISPE raises issues relating to (1) balance of quality metrics and quality management maturity;(2) proposed practice areas and metrics; (3) frequency of reporting; and (4) additional considerations.

 

The Parenteral Drug Association says it “believes that the use of metrics as a tool in understanding performance is an important part of improving processes, systems, and culture.” The association says FDA should ensure that the metrics program does not become a strict compliance requirement “as that would likely lead to unintended consequences and behaviors that are counterproductive to developing a good quality culture and continuous improvement mindset.” The letter provides several questions about the proposal for which it says industry would appreciate additional detail.

 

In its comment, Pfizer says that in principle it agrees with the proposed direction for the quality metrics program described by FDA and the flexibility on what metrics are reported and the allowance for establishments to be able to define how to calculate metrics.

 

GlaxoSmithKline submitted its answers to questions about the proposal posed by FDA in its request for comment.

Read more