Conference Report on History and Practices of FDA

Share

A 6/2017 conference convened by the Yale Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency that brought together concerned academics, patient advocates, legal and medical experts, and leaders from international organizations to talk about serious problems and dysfunctions in how medicines are developed, tested, reviewed, marketed and used, developed seven points on pharmaceutical policy for future consideration: 

  •         organized pharmaceutical lobbying has consistently tried to undermine congressional efforts to protect patients from unsafe and ineffective drugs, often with considerable success;
  •          the term “safe and effective” needs to be put in quotes because formal criteria for what constitutes safety have never been established;
  •          FDA, the agency that is expected to protect public health also has a second paymaster to serve—the pharmaceutical industry;
  •         adverse side effects from prescription drugs are very high;
  •          FDA devotes significantly fewer resources and personnel to addressing the massive level of harms, because it gives safety much lower priority than accelerating approval of new drugs;
  •          like the pharma-English term “risk-benefit ratio,” the pharma-English term “off-label” should be avoided because it is too benign and replaced with “unapproved”; and
  •          doctors are no bulwark to patient safety.

Read more