Congress Should Legislate on Generic Label: Editor

Share

JAMA deputy editor Gregory Curfman says it is “troublesome” that in most jurisdictions, both generic and innovator drug companies are protected from legal liability stemming from failure-to-warn claims. “Congress should fully consider this issue and fill the gap in the current legal framework through legislation,” he writes in a 7/23 online Viewpoint column.

The article looks at the few state courts that have addressed the issue of whether a consumer injured by a generic drug should be able to bring legal action against a brand manufacturer that negligently, recklessly, or intentionally failed to warn of known adverse drug effects that cause injury.

A recent Massachusetts decision, he says, is the latest example of a state court holding that a brand-name manufacturer failing to update a warning label with relevant safety information may be held liable. “The court justified its decision on the basis of public policy concerns for the safety of consumers while also considering the legal burden on brand-name manufacturers,” Curfman says.

The article notes that FDA proposed a rule in 2013 that would have allowed generic drug manufacturers to update product labels to reflect new drug safety developments, but received significant pushback and has not published a final rule.

“In light of FDA’s failure to act,” he concludes, “the state court opinions endorsing innovator liability are especially important.”

Read more