Court Finds State Court Defibrillator Case Preempted
A New Jersey federal judge has dismissed a state product liability suit against Boston Scientific, Guidant, and two related medical device companies because the state law claims are preempted by federal law. Attorney Elizabeth Boggia (Weil Gotshal & Manges) writes in an online blog post that the plaintiff filed suit over alleged flaws in her late husband’s defibrillator. The suit said the device contained defective leads and was unfit for the purpose — treatment of heart failure — for which it was sold. The plaintiff also claimed the device caused her husband serious harm and led to his death.
Boggia says the court held that under the state product liability act, a manufacturer is liable for failure-to-warn only if the plaintiff can prove that the device was defective, that is, not safe for its intended purpose, absent the desired warning, and that the warning was not actually provided. It determined that in granting pre-market approval, FDA evaluated the device’s safety and effectiveness and determined that its labeling was not false or misleading. “To find that the device is unsafe and defective because of the omission of a warning from an FDA-approved label would therefore overturn FDA’s determination and impose a stricter state standard,” the judge wrote.
Boggia says the case “illustrates the important role the FDA pre-market approval process plays in the assertion of a preemption defense.”