Court Reaffirms Buckman ‘Private Suit’ Ruling
A Federal Circuit Appeals Court ruling in Amarin v. ITC has reaffirmed the Supreme Court’s Buckman decision that only the federal government, and not private litigants, can bring suit for noncompliance with medical device requirements. Attorneys James Beck (ReedSmith) writes online in the Drug & Device Law blog the Amarin suit asserted Lanham Act claims that products competing with its Vascepa and containing the same active ingredient were “deceptively” labeled and advertised as “dietary supplements” when they really were illegal new drugs that had never received proper FDA approval. Its case was filed with the International Trade Commission (ITC) as a Tariff Act violation, seeking to bar importation of the supplements.
FDA called the Buckman decision to the ITC’s attention and the ITC agreed with FDA and declined to open an investigation. Beck says the decision means that “private Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act enforcement, whether under the Lanham Act or anywhere else, took it on the chin. As a matter of law, a complaint about FDA’s failure to act could not be ‘unfair competition’ under either the Tariff Act, Lanham Act, or seemingly anything else.”