Court Says Essure Suit is Preempted
A New York federal court has dismissed a suit against Bayer over its Essure implantable birth control device, holding that the plaintiff failed to allege a violation of federal law that parallels state law claims of negligent misrepresentation, strict liability, failure to warn, and breaches of express and implied warranty. Attorney Rachel Weil (Reed Smith) writes in a Drug and Device Law Blog post that the plaintiff cited the Current Good Manufacturing Processes regulations, but failed to explain how the company had violated them with its Class 3 device that had secured PMA approval from FDA.
The court held that since the plaintiff had not identified any parallel federal law or regulation, the Medical Device Amendments expressly preempted her suit as a matter of law. “The court commented that it ordinarily would have allowed the plaintiff to amend her complaint to ‘attempt to allege a plausible claim that was not preempted,’” Weil writes. “But, in yet another layer of certainty, the court held that New York’s three-year statute of limitations barred the plaintiff’s claims.” She says this was the 24th time an Essure suit has been dismissed on narrow or preempted grounds.