Court Says it Can Hear Paragraph IV Conversion Case
The Delaware federal court has denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss a generic drug patent case, rejecting the argument that conversion of a Paragraph IV certification to a Paragraph III certification deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction. Attorneys Charles Chevalier and Christine Gaddis (Gibbons) write in their firm’s online IP Law Alert that the court reasoned that in a Waxman-Hatch action, subject matter jurisdiction exists when a patent owner alleges that the filing of an ANDA infringes its patent and conversion of the type of certification does not remove that jurisdiction.
The court also reasoned, the attorneys write, that a Paragraph IV to Paragraph III conversion would not moot a case unless the defendant met the “formidable burden” to show that its wrongful conduct would not occur, and the defendants in this case had not met that burden because they expressly refused to stipulate that they would not reconvert back to a Paragraph IV certification.
The attorneys say that while the court denied the motion to dismiss the suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, it granted the defendants’ motion for partial judgment on the pleadings. The court held that the plaintiff could no longer obtain relief on their claim because the defendants had converted to Paragraph III certifications and FDA would not approve the defendants’ ANDA product until after the expiration of the plaintiffs’ patents.