Court Says Lap-Band Claims Preempted
An Alabama federal court has ruled that a plaintiff’s claims against Allergan over its Lap-Band weight loss PMA device are preempted under federal law. Attorney Michelle Yeary (Dechert) writes in an online blog post that the claims the court ruled on involved negligence, failure to warn, and negligent or fraudulent misrepresentation. “Plaintiff’s primary allegation in support of these claims was that while defendant’s label reported a 1% risk of erosion (of the Lap-Band into a patient’s stomach), studies revealed a higher complication rate,” Yeary says.
The post notes that to survive preemption, the plaintiff’s claims had to show that the state law duties the company allegedly violated and for which damages are sought are “genuinely equivalent” to the federal requirements imposed on the device. “Only when the state and federal duties are parallel will plaintiff’s claims not run afoul of the provision of the Medical Device Amendments that a state not impose requirements that are ‘different from or in addition to’ federal requirements,” Yeary writes.
She reviews the judge’s disposition of each of the plaintiff’s claims and says the court allowed the plaintiff to amend the complaint, but her quick review of the amended document shows it appears to contain most of the same allegations and deficiencies the court has already addressed, meaning it will likely lead to another round of preemptions.