Court Upholds Patent Test Extrinsic Evidence
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a district court ruling that parties may rely on extrinsic evidence when establishing a claim element’s function under the doctrine of equivalents. Attorney Karalena Guerrieri (Winston & Strawn) writes in an online post that the decision came in a case brought by Intendis GMBH against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals involving an ANDA for a topical gel for treating rosacea. The courts ruled that Glenmark’s ANDA infringed the Intendis patent under the doctrine of equivalents.
The district court had held that the excipient in the alleged infringer’s product and the claimed excipients both functioned as penetration enhancers. On appeal, Glenmark argued that the district court erred in applying the function part of the so-called function-way-result test because the patent did not define the claimed excipients as penetration enhancers.
“The Federal Circuit rejected the argument that a claim element’s function must come from the intrinsic record,” Guerrieri writes. “Instead, the appropriate test, which can be proven through extrinsic evidence, is what a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand the function of the claim element to be.”
Two other arguments raised by Glenmark also were rejected by the appeals court.