Drug Company Patent Violations Cost $40 Billion: Study

Share

The American Economic Liberties Project and the Initiative for Medicines, Access, and Knowledge (I-MAK) say the “illegal and anticompetitive tactics used by the pharmaceutical industry to perpetuate monopolies — in the form of government-backed patents over brand drugs — and block competition from more affordable generic drugs” cost final payers $40.07 billion in 2019. “This implies an average cost of about $120 in 2019 for every American, solely because of antitrust violations by the pharmaceutical industry,” the two groups’ report says.

Economic Liberties and I-MAK identified 10 overlapping strategies used by the drug industry:

  • horizontal collusion through agreements to raise prices, restrict output, rig a bidding process, allocate market share, or impose high prices or low quality across an industry rather than competing;
  • pay-for-delay or reverse payment;
  • non-generics agreement;
  • patent abuse such as sham patent litigation or patent thicketing (creating a web of overlapping patents to exclude competition) to extend monopolies;
  • product hopping and patent evergreening;
  • sham citizen petitions;
  • sham Orange Book listings;
  • REMS abuse;
  • exclusionary rebates; and
  • acquisition of monopoly.

The two advocacy groups recommend:

  • prohibiting pay-for-delay agreements between branded and generic drug manufacturers;
  • reforming FDA regulations to prohibit drug manufacturers from listing device-only and REMS patents in the Orange Book;
  • reforming FDA procedures to treat generics as substitutable equivalents to minimally adjusted versions of branded drugs;
  • dramatically increasing funding and resources to antitrust enforcers to tackle the problem of repeated pharmaceutical antitrust violations;
  • restricting laws around drug patent eligibility to ensure that drug companies can’t use bad-faith patent strategies to perpetually extend monopolies without creating useful enhancements in existing drug products;
  • developing sophisticated systems to identify likely antitrust violations from public data and intervene before patients and payers are harmed;
  • increasing penalties for corporations and individuals engaging in antitrust violations to better deter such conduct; and
  • empowering the Justice Department and state attorneys general to recover damages on behalf of public health programs, such as by filing follow-on cases to private litigation.

Read more