Europe Rules Against Amgen’s Tavneos Marketing Authorization
As Amgen continues its bid to prevent the withdrawal of Tavneos (avacopan) in the U.S., European regulators have recommended the revocation of the drug’s marketing authorization, according to a document outlining concerns. Last month, Amgen submitted to FDA new scientific data and analyses as part of its formal request for an FDA hearing, contending that the available evidence satisfies the statutory standard for substantial evidence of effectiveness (see earlier story).
Amgen has argued that the treatment continues to demonstrate a favorable benefit-risk profile for patients with severe active ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), a rare and potentially life-threatening autoimmune disease.
However, the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) made its recommendation after concluding that serious good clinical practice (GCP) breaches compromised the pivotal ADVOCATE trial used to support the drug's approval.
CHMP said its regulatory review began after EMA received new information in January concerning the sponsor's handling of the ADVOCATE database. The information raised questions about whether study data had been amended after unblinding and whether the changes complied with the prespecified protocol and statistical analysis plan.
According to CHMP, sponsor personnel reviewed unblinded efficacy data after an initial database lock on Nov. 5, 2019, and found that the study had failed to demonstrate superiority at week 52. Nine patients were subsequently re-adjudicated with knowledge of treatment outcomes, after which the primary analysis was rerun and changed from a statistically nonsignificant result to a statistically significant result for superiority at week 52. The sponsor did not disclose the original analysis or the post-unblinding data modifications in the initial marketing application or subsequent post-authorization procedures.
CHMP said the patient-level data and endpoint definitions did not support the sponsor's explanation that the re-adjudication was conducted to correct errors in the original adjudication. The committee concluded that the handling of the data breached GCP principles, including ICH E6 and ICH E9, and that the impact could not be isolated to a particular portion of the study. As a result, CHMP determined that the ADVOCATE trial as a whole could not be considered GCP-compliant or reliable.
The CHMP additionally cited Tavneos' safety profile, including reports of fatal drug-induced liver injury and vanishing bile duct syndrome. Previous periodic safety assessments had resulted in updates to the product information, including more stringent monitoring during the first three months of treatment. With the pivotal efficacy evidence considered unreliable, CHMP concluded that the serious hepatic risks were no longer outweighed by demonstrated benefits.