FDA Abandons Controversial Media Embargo Policy

Share

FDA says it is abandoning a controversial embargo policy directed at reporters that came to light last year by New York University journalism professor Charles Seife. In a lengthy analysis for Scientific American, Seife said that by holding embargoed briefings for select reporters on major issues conditional that the reporters not seek comment from anyone else before the embargo is lifted was actually turning journalist watchdogs into lapdogs, and making reporters into stenographers. He painted a grim picture of FDA and many other scientific agencies and organizations holding out the promise of information to hand-picked reporters in return for the reporters’ agreement to not seek independent comment or verification (see earlier story).


In a 1/19 letter to the Association of Health Care Journalists, outgoing FDA acting assistant commissioner for media affairs Jason Young said the agency’s embargo policy “was not adequately followed,” and that the use of a “close-hold embargo” is not to be used under any circumstance. “This approach, though, runs counter to our policy, and therefore is now included as a special point of emphasis in our staff training,” Young said.

Read more