FDA Again Pushing Uniform National Regulation: Attorney
Attorney Glenn Lammi, chief counsel for Washington Legal Foundation’s (WLF) legal studies division, writes in an online WLF Legal Pulse that FDA is once again appearing in the courts to argue for uniform, national regulation of consumer products. “In the past decade, private litigants and state officials have increasingly undercut regulatory uniformity through state tort and consumer protection lawsuits,” Lammi writes. “Rather than defend its congressional mandate through amicus briefs or other courtroom advocacy, FDA remained mostly silent during that period. This year, under the leadership of commissioner Scott Gottlieb and chief counsel Rebecca Wood, FDA has stepped off the sidelines and is once again promoting uniformity by defending its regulatory role in several third-party legal actions. That is a positive development for the producers and purchasers of FDA-regulated goods, which comprise nearly 25% of U.S. consumer spending.”
Lammi reviews three cases in which FDA has advanced arguments supporting uniformity this year, covering a negligence and product liability suit against Smith & Nephew, opposition to an International Trade Commission investigation over labeling and marketing of certain synthetically produced omega-3 products, and New York City menu labeling.
With consumer products such as prescription drugs, medical devices, packaged food, and cosmetics sold in a national marketplace, Lammi writes, uniform regulation of product approval and labeling lowers manufacturing cost by creating predictable, reliable standards and preventing the need for state-by-state production. Consumers are also assured that they are receiving the same product, with the same warnings and other information, regardless of the state of purchase.