FDA Denies DuraSeal Spinal Sealant Petition
FDA has denied a petition filed in 2013 by Thomas Law Company on behalf of tort plaintiff Marteen Moore, who claimed injury caused by DuraSeal Spinal Sealant. The agency response says the device was approved via the PMA process and is indicated for use as an adjunct to sutured dural repair during spinal surgery to provide watertight closure.
The petition asked that FDA:
- enforce post-approval conditions of the PMA by ordering the sponsor to complete enrollment in its post-approval study of infection rates (denied as moot because the final study report was submitted in 2016);
- investigate risks disclosed in the labeling that were not discussed in the PMA and require revisions to the labeling and package inserts (denied as not needed);
- investigation of an allegation of false advertising (denied);
- investigate the sponsor’s compliance with its duties to report serious adverse effects to FDA (denied);
- disclose the identities and contact information of adverse event reporters (denied); and
- grant a hearing concerning “denied disclosure of the sponsor’s complaint files and serious adverse event reports for the product by both the sponsor and the agency” (denied).
The petition also sought temporary suspension of the PMA for violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, FDA says, and that request also was denied.