FDA/EMA Pilot Program Aims to Harmonize Inspections

Share

An ongoing FDA/European Medicines Agency (EMA) pilot program on good clinical practice (GCP) inspections has shown promising results that could lead to greater harmonization and eventual mutual recognition of inspection reports, according to officials from the regulatory agencies. Speaking at a Drug Information Association session in Chicago 6/20, CDER Office of Scientific Integrity medical officer Jenn W. Sellers noted that a review of common inspections involving studies cited in FDA and EMA marketing applications since 2009 found that inspectors from both agencies had similar deficiency rates (90%) when examining clinical investigator protocol violations and reporting issues. There was also “high concordance (90%)” between FDA and EMA sponsor/contract research organization inspection findings involving trial management issues. She said there was even a “good concordance rate (75%)” involving inspection issues related to trial documentation (source documents, protocol, training records, etc.).

 

In breaking down common findings by FDA investigators during GCP inspections, Sellers said the most frequent finding (27% of inspections) involved protocol violations, such as eligibility or efficacy/safety protocol violations or reporting issues. The next most common finding was trial documentation (21% of inspections), which includes source documents, essential documents, and enrollment/training records. Additionally, study drug citations (drug supply or accountability) and informed consent violations were seen in 15% of the inspections, respectively.


Sellers said the next step in the pilot will finalize the comparison of GCP findings between the two agencies. “Based on the results of this project, recommendations will be made on how to strengthen regulatory convergence and harmonization,” she said.

Read more