FDA, HHS Cuts Can Hurt Trial Oversight: Caplan

Share

NYU Grossman School of Medicine ethicist Arthur Caplan says he is concerned that reductions in force at FDA and HHS can adversely affect clinical trial oversight and participant protections. In a Medscape video, Caplan says, “I am extremely worried about what’s been taking place at FDA and at HHS in terms of oversight and willingness to make sure that subjects are informed, that the risks and benefits of studies make sense, and even having enough people to approve studies or know where to go if somebody thought somebody had not treated them properly in the study.”

Caplan notes that the HHS Office for Human Research Protections “was hollowed out. That’s a group of people who launch investigations when there is a problem, and make sure that when people say they have a human subjects committee in place to monitor what’s going on with research, that they really do. They certify them. They have been downsized in a way that is dangerous.”

He also points out that the former HHS Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections was disbanded, and all the members were let go. “It’s not clear why,” Caplan writes, “but those were some of our best experts on how to ensure human subject safety in research.”

He also describes a “cleaning out” at FDA that affects its responsibility to get the information that lets people use drugs, medical devices, and vaccines safely, knowing that they will work.

“Many patients do want to get into clinical trials,” Caplan concludes, “and they do want access to new and novel drugs that may not have approval yet. They may face roadblocks. We have to make sure that the cuts that have been made at FDA do not harm them or their ability to access new drugs, and that human subject protections don’t weaken. If anything, we want to make sure that surveillance remains vigilant.”

Read more