FDA Needs to Revamp Advisory Committees: Opinion
FDA needs to revamp its advisory committee process because the agency often stacks the deck with experts that will vote to support its review findings, according to a 12/30 Wall Street Journal opinion piece entitled “The FDA’s Rigged Drug Committees.” The article calls on the incoming Trump Administration to make “dismantling a culture of bureaucratic control” at FDA a top priority, and particularly reforming the advisory committee process, a top priority for 2017.
“If FDA is going to run these committees merely to achieve a predetermined outcome, then let’s skip the exercise,” the opinion piece says. “Drug sponsors should at least be allowed to object to candidates for the panel and be granted time to refute the agency’s contentions, as Joseph Gulfo, executive director of the Lewis Center for Healthcare Innovation and Technology, has suggested. The panels should also include several members who have treated the disease. These changes would return advisory committee meetings to their original purpose as an outside check on FDA bias or groupthink. If Donald Trump is serious about making government accountable to the people who pay for it, FDA is a prime candidate for reform.”