FDA Security Checks Concern Agency Scientists

Share

A new policy on security background checks is raising confusion and alarm for some FDA scientists, according to an online Science post. The article says the change was included in a “communications plan” that went to agency senior staff in recent weeks. Science says the plan “appears to effectively bar the agency from hiring, whether as employees or contractors, foreign nationals who have not lived in the U.S. for a total of three out of the last five years.”

The post says the agency asserts the new requirement is based on recent revisions to government-wide security policy, “but it appears to be interpreting those rules more strictly than some other agencies.” The change would apply to new hires starting work after 10/1 and not to current staff. FDA estimates it would affect about 50 people a year, most of them postdoctoral fellows in short-term positions.

“This is a real sea change in how we function,” an FDA scientist who requested anonymity told the magazine. “We can kind of look around and name people who are now in serious leadership positions in FDA who would never have gotten in the door under this rule.”

The change involves rules for receiving standardized government identity cards that enable access to agency facilities, data, and computer systems. While some other agencies (including HHS and the National Institutes of Health) say they will continue to use an alternative approach allowing them to issue identity cards until a staffer has been in this country for three years and can undergo a standard background check, FDA is choosing not to make that alternative available, Science says.

The post says an agency spokesperson acknowledged the discrepancy and said that FDA’s primary responsibility in working with companies to regulate drug and food safety imposes special requirements. “We differ from the other HHS operating divisions in that we’re in possession of trade secrets and confidential commercial information and data that’s valued in the billions of dollars,” the spokesperson reportedly said. “So it’s our view that we need to follow both the letter and the intent of the new policy.”

Read more