FDA Sees No Justification for More Device Servicing Regs

Share

FDA says currently available objective evidence is not sufficient to conclude whether there is a widespread public health concern related to servicing of medical devices that would justify imposing additional or different burdensome regulatory requirements at this time. That position is stated in a 5/2018 agency report on the quality, safety, and effectiveness of servicing of medical devices issued as required by the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017.

The agency based its analysis on information presented at a public workshop, responses to a request for comments, and evaluation of objective evidence related to the quality, safety, and effectiveness of medical device servicing.

The objective evidence, the report says, indicates that many original equipment manufacturers and third-party entities provide high quality, safe, and effective servicing of medical devices.

FDA found that a majority of comments, complaints, and adverse event reports alleging that inadequate “servicing” caused or contributed to clinical adverse events and deaths actually pertained to “remanufacturing” rather than “servicing.”

While the objective evidence does not justify new regulations, the report concludes, steps that CDRH will take include: (1) promoting the adoption of quality management principles; (2) clarifying the difference between servicing and remanufacturing; (3) Strengthening cybersecurity practices associated with servicing of medical devices; and (4) fostering evidence development to assess the quality, safety, and effectiveness of medical device servicing.

 

Read more