FDA Should Consider Free Speech Decisions: MIWG

Share

The Medical Information Working Group (MIWG) says FDA should include recent Supreme Court First Amendment free speech decisions in its ongoing analysis of manufacturer communications regarding unapproved uses of approved or cleared medical products. In a comment to the agency docket on the subject, MIWG says FDA should ensure that it incorporates the constitutional principles reflected in the decisions into its decision making processes for both policy and enforcement matters.

The letter references five cases and says that they: 

  •          clarify the line between protected speech and conduct;
  •          clarify that rigorous scrutiny applies to any content-based regulation of non-commercial speech, and to any viewpoint-based regulation, including of commercial speech; and
  •          reject any exception to the standards for speech in highly regulated areas, including medicine.

“Together, the cases demonstrate that FDA should continue to give serious consideration to First Amendment principles as it reexamines and clarifies its regulation of medical product manufacturer communications,” MIWG writes. “The cases also suggest that the agency should assure its analysis encompasses constitutional considerations beyond those identified in its 1/2017 Memorandum, including (1) the circumstances in which manufacturer speech comprises noncommercial, fully protected speech rather than commercial speech, and (2) whether FDA’s rules and policies would satisfy a strict scrutiny standard where applicable.”

Read more