FDA Tightening ‘Research Use Only’ Tests: Lawyers
A 4/2 Warning Letter to Agena Bioscience saying the firm’s iPLEX HS Colon Panel is misbranded and adulterated because it is labeled for research use only (RUO) but reportedly is promoted for human clinical purposes signals a tightening of FDA’s enforcement of RUO labels. That’s the analysis of three SheppardMullin attorneys in an online FDA Law Blog post.
The attorneys write that since FDA has issued a relatively limited amount of guidance on the development and distribution of such products, the Warning Letter “adds important, and impactful, clarification to FDA’s policy on the issue.” Ultimately, they say, the letter is part of a larger agency movement to focus on diagnostic products that have historically been exempt from regulatory oversight.
According to the post, FDA made a statement by issuing a Warning Letter rather than an Untitled Letter or other less severe form of communication. Also, it says, the agency cited an extensive list of alleged marketing violations, including product sales to clinical customers, which may or may not have research capabilities, and the use of relatively broad promotional language.
“Ultimately, the Warning Letter presents more questions than answers,” the attorneys say. They question whether Agena will challenge the letter and whether other manufacturers will request advisory opinions to clarify the parameters in the development and distribution of RUO-labeled products. They also question whether FDA is placing the onus on manufacturers to determine the operations of laboratory customers before soliciting business and how many resources would need to be expended to make such a determination.
“While manufacturers of RUO-labeled diagnostic devices wait on answers to these and other questions,” the post concludes, “it may be prudent to begin reviewing customer lists and promotional claims to ensure that marketing activities cannot be construed as potentially condoning clinical use.”