Generally Positive Comments on PDUFA 7 Letter

Share

The Alliance for Regenerative Medicine says it supports tools outlined in FDA’s PDUFA 7 commitment letter to share information and help improve communication between the agency and sponsors. In its comment letter, it raises a concern about the increasing reliance on written responses to requests to discuss important and often time-sensitive issues. The alliance says it urges FDA “to grant more face-to-face or teleconference meeting requests as they can actually be more efficient and informative for both CBER and a sponsor.”

The Personalized Medicine Coalition says there are many reasons why PDUFA 7 will make meaningful changes for the field of personalized medicine. The coalition focuses on agency staffing, real-world evidence and real-world data, and digital health and IT infrastructure.

Atara Biotherapeutics says it particularly appreciates FDA’s recommendations in the letter to enhance CBER’s capacity to support development, review, and approval of cell and gene therapy products, launch a pilot program to facilitate the expedited CMC development of products under INDs based on the anticipated clinical benefit of earlier patient access to products, and improve overall meeting management.

The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy says it supports the commitment letter as drafted and is eager to assist FDA in PDUFA 7 reauthorization and the implementation of goals in the letter.

The comment letter from the Cancer Support Community says it appreciates procedures and goals in the letter to facilitate patients’ timely access to safe, effective, and innovative medicines. It urges the agency to expedite the publication of draft guidance by the end of 2022 that sets forth formal requirements on what patient experience data is collected in clinical trials and how it is uniformly captured, reported, and meaningfully and consistently communicated to ensure all stakeholders realize the full benefits offered by the programs.

Public Citizen suggests the commitments were drafted too much with the drug industry in mind and recommends the development of additional performance measures to assess the actual short- and long-term public health impacts of agency decisions on drugs and biologics. It also recommends that the letter include performance measures based on anonymous surveys of FDA reviewers and advisory committee members about their experiences reviewing NDAs and BLAs.

Read more