Generic Drugs Not Covered by West Virginia Tort Law
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia says there is no cause of action in the state for failure to warn and negligent misrepresentation against a brand-name drug manufacturer when the drug taken by a plaintiff was produced by a generic drug company. The court issued its 5/11 ruling in response to a question posed to it by the federal Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The case involved a generic form of Janssen’s Levaquin (levofloxacin) produced by Dr. Reddy’s, and a plaintiff’s claim that the drug caused acute respiratory distress (ARDS).
The plaintiffs argued that generic manufacturers used the labeling information from the branded version and claimed that Janssen was aware that ARDS had been linked to the use of levofloxacin but negligently failed to include a warning, knowing that the omission would appear in the labeling for both branded and generic versions.
According to the plaintiffs, although a generic version of the drug was taken, Janssen had exclusive control of the content of the Warnings that were published to the public and to healthcare providers for both the branded and generic forms of the drug.
Janssen sought and was granted summary judgment in a federal district court, with the court saying that every appeals court that had considered the issue had rejected the notion that a brand-name manufacturer’s statements about its drug could be the basis for liability for injuries caused by another manufacturer’s product. The plaintiffs appealed the case to the 4th Circuit, which asked the state court to answer the question about applicability of state law in West Virginia.