Government Wants SCOTUS Biosim Provision Review
The U.S. acting solicitor general is recommending that the Supreme Court hear appeals by Amgen and Sandoz on the implementation of portions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). In an amicus brief, the acting solicitor general says that a Federal Circuit Court of Appeals conclusion that an applicant may provide the 180-day advance notice of first commercial marketing of its biosimilar only after FDA has licensed the biosimilar, and that a court may enforce a section of the law by enjoining the applicant from such marketing until 180 days after the applicant provides that notice was incorrect. That ruling was appealed by Amgen.
Sandoz challenged the court’s determination that where an applicant fails at the outset to provide the sponsor with its aBLA and manufacturing process information, the sponsor’s only recourse under the law is to bring an immediate patent suit. The acting solicitor general says the appeals court got it right in that part of its ruling.
“The proper interpretation of those provisions has a significant impact on the operation of the BPCIA and the ability of aBLA applicants promptly to bring their biosimilars to the public,” the brief says. “And because the provisions are integrally related, the court should consider all of the questions presented together.”
Observers say that the acting solicitor general’s recommendation that the high court hear the appeal is a very strong signal that the court is likely to do so. They say the case is expected to be briefed in early 2017, argued in April, and decided by the end of June.