Heart Trial Protocol Changed: Public Citizen
Public Citizen says HHS has made substantive changes to the protocol and consent forms for a National Institutes of Health clinical trial that the advocacy group said had potentially serious ethical violations. In an 8/1/17 letter, Public Citizen called for immediate suspension of the Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion (MINT) trial.
A Public Citizen statement says the trial involves randomly assigning patients suffering heart attacks and anemia to one of two blood transfusion strategies — either a “liberal” strategy in which they are transfused sooner at higher red blood cell levels, or a “restrictive” strategy in which they are transfused only when they hit a significantly lower red blood cell count. “Prior studies already strongly suggest that a restrictive transfusion strategy is more likely to lead further heart attacks and death than a liberal strategy,” Public Citizen says.
In its complaint, the group said the trial lacked adequate protections for human subjects and violated these basic ethical principles: (1) the restrictive strategy may put the subjects’ health and lives at unacceptable risk; (2) the trial protocol fails to provide key information that an institutional review board would need to determine whether the study meets approval criteria; and (3) the sample consent form for subjects failed to adequately describe the study purpose, the trial risks, and whether the transfusion strategies being tested are experimental.
Changes made to the trial protocol and consent form, the group says, include:
- revising the protocol to better describe current usual care for transfusing patients having acute heart attacks;
- adding to the protocol a requirement that a potential subject may not be enrolled unless the person’s attending doctor, with expertise in cardiovascular care, believes that both transfusion strategies are consistent with good medical care for the subject; and
- adding to the participant consent form a more appropriate description of the trial purpose and a description of the possible risks of the restrictive transfusion strategy.