HHS Good Guidance Rules Could ‘Ossify’ FDA: Analysis
HHS published 12/7 a rulemaking formally adopting good guidance practices (GGP) that are to be followed by all component HHS agencies, including FDA. Attorney T. Daniel Logan (Kleinfeld Kaplan Becker) outlines the impact on FDA, which has had its own different good guidance practices that were adopted 20 years ago to comply with requirements of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997.
Logan says the HHS and FDA regulations differ at the outset, with contrasting approaches to defining which agency documents constitute “guidance” for GGP. “The HHS definition of guidance appears to be broader than FDA’s definition and gives FDA less leeway to proactively determine that a document would not constitute guidance,” he writes.
The post also looks at procedural and political controls on guidance documents and petitions for review of guidance documents.
“By instituting procedural controls that differ from current FDA requirements, increasing political review of guidance on a non-delegable basis, and instituting a potentially onerous guidance petition process, the HHS GGPs, if fully implemented, have the potential to ossify guidance development at FDA,” Logan says. “Such a shutdown could make FDA less able to adopt new guidance or revise older guidance to respond to changing technologies, markets, or research. The GGPs also represent a clear step to remove some of FDA’s autonomy from HHS.”
The post notes that the incoming Biden administration would withdraw the Executive Order containing the GGPs, rendering moot the need for FDA to amend its regulations to match the HHS version.