Improve HHS Oversight of Pathogen Research: GAO
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) says HHS could improve its oversight of research involving enhanced potential pandemic pathogens. The GAO report faults a six-year-old HHS oversight framework that requires funding agencies to refer proposed research that is reasonably anticipated to create, transfer, or use enhanced potential pandemic pathogens to the department for additional review of associated risks and benefits. GAO says this does not fully meet the key elements of effective oversight identified in past work.
For example, it says, the framework does not provide a standard to help funding agencies interpret what “reasonably anticipated” means, thus allowing for subjective and potentially inconsistent interpretations of the requirement.
GAO recommended that:
- HHS work with funding agencies to develop and document a standard for “reasonably anticipated;”
- HHS work with funding agencies to identify and share non-sensitive information with researchers; and
- the Centers for Disease Control director assess and document the risks posed by the limitations of the existing DSAT (Division of Select Agents and Toxins) exemptions for public health emergencies and seek legislative authority as needed.
GAO says HHS neither agreed nor disagreed with the first two recommendations and concurred with the third recommendation.