Improving Myelodysplastic Syndromes Trials

Share

Cancer researchers from FDA and several academic medical centers say clinical trials for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treatments should be designed from the outset to allow the practicable application of new therapies in the high-needs population, with drugs that can be administered and tolerated in community settings, and with endpoints that meaningfully improve patients’ lives over existing therapies. Writing in Clinical Cancer Research, the researchers say trials should also capitalize on an expanding understanding of the biology of these disorders to effect substantive change in patient outcomes.

The article shares the discussion at a 4/2022 panel of regulators and experts in MDS convened by FDA to improve MDS drug development. The panel reviewed challenges in MDS clinical trial design and endpoints and outlined considerations for future trial design to help drug development meaningfully meet patient needs.

Challenges identified for defining clinical benefit in MDS included cumbersome response criteria, standardized transfusion thresholds, and application and validation of patient-reported outcome instruments.

The panel said that clinical trials should reflect the biology of disease evolution, the advanced age of MDS patients, and how patients are treated in real-world settings to maximize the likelihood of identifying active drugs. In patients with lower-risk diseases, response criteria for anemic patients should be based on baseline transfusion dependency, improvement in symptoms, and quality of life.

For higher-risk MDS patients, the panelists said, trials should include guidance to prevent dose reductions or delays that could limit efficacy, specify minimal durations of treatment (in the absence of toxicity or progression), and have endpoints focused on overall survival and durable response.

Read more