‘Industry-wide Dance’ Shapes BPCIA Framework: Attorneys
Patterson Belknap attorneys say that a number of court decisions since the 2010 enactment of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) have laid out the basic framework for implementation of the act, at least until the next series of disputes is litigated. Writing in an online post, the attorneys say that “just as the BPCIA’s procedures are known as a ‘patent dance’ between the biosimilar applicant and the innovator, the development of the case law can be seen as an industry-wide dance, with biosimilar applicants and innovators each moving in unison to take consistent, but diametrically opposed, positions on a series of fundamental issues concerning the operation of the statute.”
The post reviews four issues that have been adjudicated: rejection of pre-application declaratory judgment actions, determination that the patent dance is optional, determination that the 180-day marketing notice period does not begin until FDA has approved a biosimilar, and determination that the 180-day notice period is mandatory.
“Through resolution of these disputes the basic framework for BPCIA patent litigation has taken shape,” the post concludes. “Although more disputes will undoubtedly arise in the future, particularly as biosimilar applicants begin to challenge newer biologics that are still protected by the statutory 12-year exclusivity period, the fundamental questions about the operation of the statute are well on their way to being resolved.”