Inter-Center Communication Lacking: BIO

Share
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) says there is a lack of cohesive process for programs involving multiple FDA Centers, specifically CDER and CDRH. Commenting on an agency draft guidance on best practices for communication between IND sponsors and FDA during drug development, BIO says FDA should specifically address combination products and diagnostics to ensure that inter-Center communication and coordination are adequately addressed. “These best practices should ensure that the appropriate Center/Division responds to questions directly related to their area of responsibility and expertise, and that there is formal coordination between Centers when developing agency feedback or a position on topics overlapping between Centers/Division,” the trade group says.

The letter says that BIO strongly supports the PDUFA 5 program to enhance FDA-sponsor communication and applauds agency efforts to give IND sponsors and FDA review staff best practices and procedures for timely, transparent, and effective communications during drug development through the draft guidance.

In past comments, BIO says, it identified four main areas where communications improvement could enable a more effective development and review process — improving scientific dialog, improving effectiveness of formal meetings with FDA, improving communications between FDA and sponsors on emerging and evolving science, and communication improvements to the agency Web site. “We are pleased that FDA discusses and provides recommendations on these topics in this draft guidance,” it says.

The letter includes detailed line-by-line comments.

Read more