Jury Awards $8 Billion in Risperdal Case

Share

A Philadelphia jury delivered an $8 billion punitive verdict against Johnson & Johnson and its alleged improper marketing of the antispychotic drug Risperdal, according to a Law.com article. The three-week trial in Murray v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals resulted in the largest penalty to date in the Risperdal litigation, which involves nearly 7,000 cases pending in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. Nicholas Murray had previously won $680,000 over his claims that the company failed to warn that young men using Risperdal could grow breasts.

 

“This jury resoundingly told Johnson & Johnson that its actions were deliberate and reckless,” plaintiff’s attorney Thomas R. Kline (Kline & Specter) was quoted as saying after the verdict was handed down. “And the conduct that the jury saw in this courtroom, clearly and convincingly, which is our legal standard, [was] a company that disregarded the safety of the most vulnerable of children. This is an important moment, not only for this litigation, but for J&J, which is a company that has lost its way.”

 

In a statement to the press, J&J spokesman Andrew Wheatley said the award was “grossly disproportionate” to the compensatory award and the company “is confident it will be overturned... The company was precluded from presenting a meaningful defense due to the court’s exclusion of key evidence. As a result, the jury did not hear evidence as to how the label for Risperdal clearly and appropriately outlined the risks associated with the medicine, or the benefits Risperdal provides to patients with serious mental illness. Further, the plaintiff’s attorneys failed to present any evidence that the plaintiff was actually harmed by the alleged conduct.”

Read more