Latest FDA Warning Letters

Share

FDA has posted its latest batch of Warning Letters. They can be accessed by clicking on the link following each letter.

Bellus Medical, LLC. Dallas, TX (9/13). FDA inspected the firm in March and determined that it markets the SkinPen II device without having submitted a 510(k). FDA said that general devices classified under 21 CFR 878.4820 (Dermabrasion Brush, Powered) are exempt from premarket notification. However, it said the SkinPen II is a microneedling device intended to achieve its clinical effect through the creation of many small puncture wounds in the skin using an array of needles, and thus raises different questions of safety and effectiveness. It was also concerned because the safe ranges of needle lengths, penetration depths, and speeds of the device are unknown. Additionally, concerns were raised on infection and cross-contamination due to the reusable portion of the device.
http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2016/ucm520649.htm

Collagen Matrix, Inc. Oakland, NJ (9/20). An 11/2015 FDA inspection at the firm’s Oakland and Franklin Lakes, NJ facilities found GMP and quality system violations. For example, the firm failed to adequately conduct design validation on its  ZCORE Porcine Xenograft Particulate in Syringe device. Additionally, FDA cited the firm for making significant design changes to ZCORE since its initial 510(k) clearance in 2014, and such changes could significantly affect the safety and effectiveness of this device. For example, changes to packaging and delivery via the manufacturing process of the device presents biocompatibility and sterilization validation concerns. For such a change, FDA says a 510(k) submission is required to demonstrate that the polymers used in the syringe applicator/packaging do not give off leachables or extractables that could contaminate the biocompatibility of the materials in the device.
http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2016/ucm522402.htm

Navinta, LLC. Ewing, NJ (9/26). FDA inspected the firm in May and documented serious violations of the Postmarketing Adverse Drug Experience (PADE) reporting requirements. Specifically, the firm failed to develop adequate written procedures for the surveillance, receipt, evaluation, and reporting of postmarketing adverse drug experiences (ADEs). Although there is a written agreement for a product distributor, there is no procedure between the two parties describing how notification of ADEs will be performed.  Further, the agreement does not describe how non-serious ADEs will be addressed.
http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2016/ucm522920.htm

Read more