Law Settles ‘Active Ingredient’ Debate
A Congressional Research Service paper says Congress adopted 4/23/2021 legislation that generally codified FDA’s long-standing approach to evaluating new chemical entity (NCE) exclusivity. The paper, Defining Active Ingredient: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Legal Interpretation of Regulatory Exclusivities, reviews the history of the debate between FDA and the pharmaceutical industry over the definition of “active ingredient” and the application of the definition.
Historically,” the paper says, “for the exclusivity provisions, FDA interpreted ‘active ingredient’ to mean ‘active moiety,’ as defined by FDA regulations. FDA generally defines active moiety as the core molecule or ion of a drug…. FDA’s interpretation generated disputes between FDA and pharmaceutical companies as FDA’s approach tends to exclude some drugs from being afforded five-year NCE exclusivity under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). In 2015, a federal district court rejected FDA’s interpretation as inconsistent with the statutory language, though it did not explicitly invalidate FDA’s regulations.”
Two years later, the paper says, Congress enacted legislation that generally codified FDA’s long-standing approach to evaluating NCE exclusivity and extended that approach to certain other provisions under the FFDCA. “This legislation effectively mooted questions about the validity of FDA’s interpretation and clarified when chemical entities are sufficiently similar to be considered identical for purposes of drug approval and exclusivity,” the report concludes…. “In effect, the law committed the decision as to which molecules should be deemed effectively the same and therefore not innovative enough to merit NCE exclusivity to FDA’s judgment.”