Lawyers Discuss FDA Bias Concern on Chantix Study

Share

A briefing document prepared for a joint advisory committee meeting that voted 10-9 to recommend removal of a Boxed Warning for Pfizer’s Chantix relating to potential psychiatric risks, including suicide and suicidal ideation, raised CDER medical reviewer concerns that data from a company post-marketing study were biased depending on how money the company gave the investigators. Three Hogan Lovells attorneys write in an online blog post that the study results appeared to show that the drug did not significantly increase the incidence of suicide and suicidal thoughts.

“FDA suggested that money given to investigators from Pfizer may have influenced the study results,” the post says. “According to the briefing document, in sites where investigators received $25,000 or more in speaking and consulting fees from the company, only 1.8% of patients who had already been diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder were reported to have side effects, such as anxiety, agitation, hostility, or suicidal thoughts, during the trial. On the other hand, at locations where physician/investigators received less money or no payments at all from Pfizer, 6.4% of patients were reported to experience such side-effects.”

The attorneys say that the agency’s briefing document message was essentially clear — the study results may not be trustworthy given how the data were collected and analyzed, and due to conflicts of interest related to payments to investigators. “This briefing document is the first time we are aware of agency disclosure of concerns about bias from industry payments to clinical investigators,” they write. “We will be watching closely for other indicators of concern by the agency regarding such payments…. Given that reviewers have expressed concerns about the data used to support the removal, this regulatory decision will be particularly interesting and one that could influence conflicts of interest disclosure policy going forward.”

Read more