Look at FDA Enforcement and 1st Amendment: MIWG
In an amicus brief filed with a Massachusetts federal court, the Medical Information Working Group asks that the court address concerns that FDA enforcement policy is not consistent with 1st and 5th Amendment principles that permit manufacturers to engage in truthful and non-misleading communications about product off-label uses. The brief was filed in United States v. Facteau to support the defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal or a new trial, according to a blog post by attorney Lisa Baird (Reed Smith).
The case involves an executive of the Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Acclarent who, along with another executive, was indicted on 10 counts of introducing adulterated or misbranded medical devices into interstate commerce, one count of conspiracy, three counts of securities fraud, and four counts of wire fraud. The government charged that the executives schemed to fraudulently drive up Acclarent revenues and stock valuation by marketing the Reliva Stratus Microflow Spacer for uses not cleared or approved by FDA. A whistleblower claimed that the company marketed the sinus device for a drug delivery use not approved by FDA. The whistleblower suit was settled by J&J for $18 million two days after a federal court jury acquitted the executives of felony charges but found them guilty of misdemeanor charges of introducing adulterated or misbranded medical devices into interstate commerce.
The brief says that the unclear rules that characterize the regulatory framework and the government’s expansive and ad-hoc approach to enforcement provide inadequate notice of the line between permissible and impermissible speech and, as a result, manufacturers’ constitutionally protected speech is chilled, Baird writes.
She suggests that the brief will be a “useful resource for anyone addressing off-label promotional issues, regardless of whether those involve alleged regulatory violations, as with the criminal prosecution in Facteau or allegations of tort liability in civil litigation.”
In a related development, FDA will hold an 11/9-10 public hearing on “Manufacturer Communications Regarding Unapproved Uses of Cleared Medical Products.